In general the experimental design was excellent and clearly written. Was any quality trimming done? It wasn't indicated in the text. In keeping with true open access these scripts, with a short description of there usage context, should also be made available.įinally, I would suggest explicitly indicating how much data was generated (reads, base pairs). In fairness the scripts are a minor concern but they do not seem to be available. Particularly for the isolates this would be important to mention. ![]() There is no explicit mention of whether the isolates or filters have been saved or would be available for other researchers. There is a note indicating that the data is being submitted to Genbank but it was not clear what data (reads, assemblies) was submitted. ![]() The paper generates the following kinds of data:ġ) Bacterial isolates from a marine environmentĢ) Microbial materials collected on filters from coral and marine environmentsģ) Sequencing reads from bacterial isolatesĤ) Sequencing reads from metagenomic samplesĪs the reviewer I am unable to verify that the assemblies or read data are going to be publicly available. ![]() Figures and tables are comprehensive and helpful. The introduction and background are reasonable given the premise of the paper. This paper is clearly written and well organized.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |